Sanghavi Savla Commodity Brokers Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Related Judgements

1. ACIT vs. Crescent Property Developers (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Though the assessee offered a sum of Rs. 1 crore during the survey on account of discrepencies, errors and omissions in the accounts, at the stage of the assessment, there is no reference to any incriminating material found during the … ACIT vs. Crescent Property Developers (ITAT Mumbai)…

2. Shubhmangal Portfolio Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The assessee’s argument supra of the same being only a differential treatment of the very same, i.e., rental, income, so that there has been thus neither any concealment nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, though appealing, is misconceived. The reason is simple. Yes, the assessee has apparently stated…

3. ITO vs. Dipti Nikhil Modi (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The degree of proof necessary under the Explanation-1 to section 271(1)(c) can be discharged by the assessee by pointing out the factors and the material in his favour, because explanation merely raises a rebuttal presumption to which assessee can always discharge his onus by pointing out the factors relating…

4. Parinee Developers Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The penalty notice issued u/s 274 of the Act is ambiguous to the extent for which the penalties are initiated. The said notice does not specify where the present penalty is being levied for concealment of income or for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. CIT (A) did not…

5. Mangalam Drugs & Organics Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   It is further noted, from the perusal of penalty order, that the penalty has been levied, on all the additions/disallowances, in a ‘whole sale’ manner. The AO has not given his findings, for levying the penalty, for each issue separately, with respect to the satisfaction of the AO for…