| COURT: | ITAT Chennai |
| CORAM: | A. Mohan Alankamony (AM), N.R.S. Ganesan (JM) |
| SECTION(S): | 194, 194-J, 194C |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | TDS deduction |
| COUNSEL: | N. Venkataraman, R. Vijayaraghavan |
| DATE: | July 20, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | July 28, 2015 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2007-08 to 2011-12 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| S. 194C/ 194J: No obligation to deduct TDS at stage of making provision for expenditure if payee cannot be identified. No obligation to deduct TDS if services (roaming charges) are rendered without human intervention and are not "technical services" | |
The assessee has to issue Form 16A prescribed under Rule 31(1)(b) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the tax deducted at source. The assessee has to necessarily give the details of name and address of deductee, the PAN of deductee and amount or credited. In this case, the assessee could not identify the name and address of deductee and and his PAN. The assessee also may not be in a position to quantify the amount required for incurring the expenditure for dismantling and restoration of site to its original position. In those circumstances, the provision which requires deduction of tax at source fails. Hence, the assessee cannot be faulted for non-deduction of tax at source while making a provision
Recent Comments