Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter:

Dholadhar Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: February 21, 2014 (Date of publication)

Click here to download the judgement (Dholadhar_Investment_ITAT_duties.pdf)

S. 254: Tribunal is not required to consider pleadings, material etc to which its pointed attention is not drawn

It is true, as held by the Supreme Court in a long line of cases that the Tribunal is duty-bound to consider all the grounds, the evidence produced and consider the contentions of the parties before it and all other material brought to its notice in a judicial spirit and should not feel incommoded by technicalities: The duty is limited to the points raised before it. It would be placing an impossible burden on the Tribunal if it is ordained to rule upon aspects and contentions which were not raised by the parties before it or to deal with pleadings, evidence or material to which its pointed attention was not drawn in the course of the proceedings and which lies buried in the forest of papers filed by the parties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *