CIT vs. Mahalaxmi Glass (Bombay High Court)

Related Judgements

1. CIT vs. Narendra Desai (Bombay High Court) 

   Receipt for agreeing to refrain from carrying on a competing business under a restrictive covenant is a capital receipt and is not chargeable to tax either as a revenue receipt or as a capital gain as ss. 28(va) and 55(2)(a) … CIT vs. Narendra Desai (Bombay High Court)…

2. Ornate Traders vs. ITO (Bombay High Court) 

   Where the department sought condonation of delay of several months in filing appeals in several matters and explained the reasons for the delay in a casual and negligent manner and without giving even the basic details, HELD, castigating the department that:
   Read more ›

3. CIT vs. Raval Tiles & Vijayjyot (Bombay High Court) 

   Where the Tribunal did not pass an order on the appeal despite considerable delay and instead fixed the matter repeatedly for ‘clarifications’ and thereafter closed the matter for orders on the basis of written submissions and without hearing the assessee, HELD the procedure followed by the Tribunal was not…

4. Plastiblends vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court) 

   On the question as to whether for the purpose of availing deduction under Ch VI-A of the Act, the gross total income is required to be computed by deducting allowable depreciation even though the assessee had disclaimed the same for the purpose of regular assessment, there is a conflict…

5. Prasad Agents vs. ITO (Bombay High Court) 

   Where the question arose whether the Explanation to s. 73 (which deems the loss from trading in shares by a company to be speculation loss) can be confined only to cases where there is manipulation and whether the loss arising on valuation of closing stock of shares is also…