COURT: | Bombay High Court |
CORAM: | M. S. Sanklecha J, Sandeep K. Shinde J |
SECTION(S): | 143(3) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | consistency principle, res judicata |
COUNSEL: | Ajay R. Singh |
DATE: | June 28, 2018 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | July 5, 2018 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2008-09 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
Difference between "Res Judicata" and "Consistency Principle" explained. While "res judicate" does not apply to income-tax matters, the principles of consistency does. If the Revenue has accepted a practice and consistently applied and followed it, the Revenue is bound by it. The Revenue can change the practice only if there is a change in law or change in facts and not otherwise |
The reason why courts have held parties to the opinion expressed in a decision in one assessment year to the same opinion in a subsequent year is not because of any principle of res judicata but because of the theory of precedent or the precedential value of the earlier pronouncement. Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasijudicial or judicial can generally be permitted to take a different view
Recent Comments