COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
CORAM: | G. Manjunatha (AM), Ravish Sood (JM) |
SECTION(S): | 68, 69C |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | Bogus purchases, Bogus Sales |
COUNSEL: | Harshwardhabn Datar, Mangar Shukla |
DATE: | April 10, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | September 6, 2019 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2007-08 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
Bogus purchases in s. 153D search assessment: There is serious suspicion about the conduct of the assessee in taking additional ground challenging the issue of approval u/s 153D for the first time before the Tribunal. The assessee is making an attempt is derail the issue on merits and to escape on technical ground. The affidavits filed by the AOs coupled with circumstantial evidences available in the assessment folders clearly establish the fact of obtaining necessary approval u/s 153D though copy of approval letter is not available in the assessment record. Argument that only profit can be assessed is not correct. 100% addition u/s 69C towards bogus purchases confirmed (NK Proteins 292 CTR 354 (SC) followed) |
When assessee goes to question the administrative procedure, rather contending its case on merits, that too, after a lapse of 4 to 5 years, then obviously, a doubt arises about intend of the assessee in taking this ground and such an attempt is derail the issue on merits and to escape on technical ground. Therefore, we are of the considered view that there is no merit in the additional ground taken by the assessee challenging validity of assessment order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Recent Comments