Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

This section is now closed. Click here for new judgements

Home › All Judgements › DCIT vs. Envision Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

DCIT vs. Envision Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

Posted on by editor — No Comments ↓
COURT:
CORAM: ,
SECTION(S): ,
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: August 7, 2015 (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: August 10, 2015 (Date of publication)
AY: 2006-07
FILE: Click here to download the file in pdf format
CITATION:
(i) DR can only support the AO's order and cannot set up an altogether new case before the ITAT, (ii) Loss on sale of shares, even if a speculation loss, can be set-off against the gains on sale of shares

(i) The Departmental Representative has no jurisdiction to go beyond the order passed by the Assessing Officer. He cannot raise any point different from that considered by the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). His scope of arguments is confined to supporting or defending the impugned order. He cannot set up an altogether different case;

(ii) Even if the loss claimed by the assessee relating to share transactions as well as loss resulting on valuation of closing stock is treated as speculation loss, the same is entitled to be set-off against the profit on sale of shares in view of DLF Commercial Developers Ltd. 261 CTR (Del) 127.

Related Judgements

  1. IVF Advisors Private Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

    “Derivatives” include foreign currency call option/ put option. These transactions are of derivative markets and cannot be termed as speculative in natureRead more ›
  2. DCIT vs. Baljit Securities Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata) 

    (i) Both trading of shares and derivative transactions are not coming under the purview of Section 43(5) of the Act which provides definition of “speculative transaction” exclusively for purposes of section 28 to 41 of the Act. Again, the fact … DCIT vs. Baljit Securities Private Limited (ITAT…
  3. Araska Diamond Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

    Unless the assessee shows that there was some existing contract in respect of which he was likely to suffer a loss because of future price fluctuations and that it was to safeguard against such loss that he entered into the … Araska Diamond Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT…
  4. M/s. Majestic Exports vs. JCIT (ITAT Chennai) 

    We make it clear that total transaction considered for determining this business loss from derivative transactions cannot be more than the total export turnover of the assessee for the assessment year under consideration and if the derivative transaction is in excess of export turnover, then that loss suffered in…
  5. Ramesh Kumar & Co vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

    The AO has made the addition as some of the suppliers of the assessee were declared Hawala dealer by the Sales tax Department. This may be a good reason for making further investigation but the AO did not make any further investigation and merely completed the assessment on suspicion….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*