COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
CORAM: | Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (AM), Saktijit Dey (JM) |
SECTION(S): | 145 |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | Bogus purchases, Bogus Sales |
COUNSEL: | Rahul Hakani |
DATE: | May 16, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | June 19, 2019 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2009-10 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
Bogus Purchases: The CIT(A) is not justified in enhancing the assessment to disallow 100% of the bogus purchases. The only addition which can be made is to account for profit element embedded in the purchase transactions to factorize for profit earned by assessee against possible purchase of material in the grey market and undue benefit of VAT against such bogus purchases (PCIT vs. Mohommad Haji Adam (Bom HC) followed |
The assessee was in possession of primary purchase documents and the payments to the suppliers was through banking channels. The assessee had established corresponding sales before Ld. AO. The books of accounts were audited wherein quantitative details of stock was provided. We are of the considered opinion that there could be no sale without actual purchase of material keeping in view the fact that the assessee was engaged in trading activities. At the same time, the assessee failed to produce even a single supplier to confirm the purchase transactions. The delivery of material could not be substantiated.
Recent Comments