Category: Supreme Court/High Court related

Dept’s Guidelines on When & How To File/Oppose S. 260A Appeals In High Court

Pursuant to a Writ Petition challenging the imposition of service tax on lawyers and the prayer seeking interim relief by way of “restraining the Respondents from giving effect to directly or indirectly or acting upon the impugned provisions or collecting any service tax on the assistance provided as an officer of the Court by an advocate“, the Andhra Pradesh High Court vide order dated 18.5.2011 has ordered “Since it is represented that the other High Courts have already granted stay in similar circumstances, there shall be interim stay, until further orders

Bombay High Court’s Tax Bench w.e.f. 06.06.2011

The Bar Association of Gauhati has filed a Writ Petition in the Gauhati High Court to challenge the levy of service-tax on “Legal Consultancy Services”. The High Court has on 29th April 2011 said the matter requires in-depth scrutiny and directed that service-tax would not be recovered till the next date of hearing being 25th May 2011

The Delhi Bar Association has filed a Writ Petition in the Delhi High Court being WP No. 2792 of 2011 to challenge the levy of service-tax on “Legal Consultancy Services”. The High Court has today (29th April 2011) issued notice on the Writ Petition and stayed the application of the impugned provision till the next date of hearing being 23rd May 2011

Several instructions and directions have been issued by the CBDT from time to time emphasizing upon the need for timely filing of appeals/SLPs in the Supreme Court and proper conduct of litigation. However, a number of SLPs are being filed with inordinate delay. In the wake of repeated displeasure expressed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on the present state of affairs, Ld. Attorney General for India has advised the Board to work towards a "Zero Delay Regime" in the matter of filing of appeals/SLPs

The sitting list and assignment of Judicial Work on the Original side of the Bombay High Court on and from Monday, the 7th March 2011 until further orders will be as under

The Chief Commissioner and Commissioner concerned would be personally responsible to ensure timely filing of appeals

Sitting list and assignment of Judicial Work on the Original side of the Bombay High Court on and from Wednesday, the 5th January 2011

We are happy to report that our tireless efforts have borne fruit. According to news reports, a Parliamentary standing committee has endorsed the governments proposal to increase the retirement age of HC judges from 62 to 65.The committee said with retirement age of judges of the HCs and the SC coming on a par, there would be less competition among the HC judges for elevation to the SC