Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter:

Dept Complies With High Court Directives & Sets Out Detailed Procedure For Filing Appeals and Effective Representation In the Delhi High Court

In National Petroleum Construction Company Vs. DIT in ITA Nos. 143, 144, 533/2013 and 795/2014, the Delhi High Court in its order dt. 13.08.2015, dt. 20.08.2015 and 28.09.2015 directed the Income Tax Department to formulate and implement a standard operating procedure on the following three issues:

(i) Issue No.1:- A mechanism should be put in place for immediate and seamless transfer of cases from one standing counsel to another so that unnecessary adjournments are not sought by the counsels on the ground of lack of formal order of allocation, want of instructions or papers. The lTD to ensure that in none of the matters there is a situation where (a) there is no one appearing for the lTD (b) even if they are, they have neither instructions nor papers. It will be responsibility of the lTD to ensure that the standing counsel who have been assigned the cases have the complete records. It should not be an excuse for Standing Counsel of the lTD to take adjournment on the ground that they have no instructions or that they do not have the case papers.

(ii) Issue No. 2:- There should be a definite time limits within which the appeals will be filed and re-filed by the Panel Counsel after curing the defects and bringing them up for hearing before the court. There should be a system devised by the lTD to monitor on a constant basis the adherence to time lines in various matters entrusted to standing counsel. If there is delay beyond acceptable limit, the case to be assigned to another counsel to complete the further steps within the stipulated time frame. Specific time lines be set for Standing Counsel to complete the steps and consequence of the counsel failing to adhere to those time limits must be clearly spelt out.

(iii) Issue No. 3:- Issues that may be pending before other High Courts or the Supreme Courts which have attained finality one way or the other, i.e. either in favour of the revenue or the Assessee, there should be a regular channel of communication of such information to the standing counsel. lTD should digitise all its records and engage teams of persons with requisite knowledge who can assist in collating information of specific areas from the digitised data.

Pursuant to the said directives of the High Court, the Chief Commissioner has issued a detailed document titled “PROCEDURE FOR FILING APPEALS, CURING DEFECTIVE APPEALS AND EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION IN THE DELHI HIGH COURT”. The said document sets out the standard operating procedure to be followed by the department in all cases.


4 comments on “Dept Complies With High Court Directives & Sets Out Detailed Procedure For Filing Appeals and Effective Representation In the Delhi High Court
  1. Adv. I.S.Verma says:

    Consideration of posting of the Officers as A.R(s) in various Tribunals,generally (exceptions are rare), as punishment postings coupled with lack of proper infrastructure & heavy work load seems to be the, if not main, at least most important reason for the Officers to get discouraged and lose interest in the work. To have useful & proper representation before the relevant Tribunals, Hon’le Supreme Court & High Courts CBDT & CBEC should appoint retired members of Tribunal- of course after due scrutiny of their Antecedents, who can assist and guide the Officers in achieving the revenue’s goal of proer & effective representation.

  2. Varaprasad Daitha says:

    The directive of Hon’ble Delhi High Court had been implemented by the Pr. CCIT New Delhi. Was the CBDT not aware of this and why it did not implement in the entire tax India. Or is it waiting for another severe comments from other high courts also?

    • bobjee kurien says:

      Another feather in the cap of the chairperson!!!.Extracting another public appology from the Revenue Secretary.Don Quixote is a far Second now.Keep up the good work!!!!IRS knows how to play the game too.The IAS cadre is now at the receiving end!!!!

    • Rajesh Bhardwaj says:

      Sir, I agree. The procedure requires to be made applicable on all India basis. Till a few years back, the situation of departmental representation was very grim in Kolkata. Lack of coordination and not many willing o be posted in High Court cell have resulted in a situation where Hon. High Court has to intervene in a purely administrative matter of the department. Payments to Standing Counsels getting delayed is also a sore point. Active involvement of higher authorities will help. My personal meeting with CJI of Hon. Delhi High court helped in clearing a large number of pending acquisition appeal matters in Delhi High court after the Hon. CJI gave appropriate directions for early disposal. Similar meetings at CCIT level will be productive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Top

If you are a tax professional, you must sign up for our free newsletter. Why? Because we keep you informed about the latest developments in the world of tax. We focus only on the most important must-read judgements & articles that will impact your day-to-day professional work. You can see a chronological listing of all our postings on twitter & facebook


IMPORTANT: After signing up & clicking on the confirmation mail, send a test/ blank mail to editor@itatonline.info. Why? Because it is the easiest way to add our email address to your address/ contacts book and ensure that our Newsletter does not get sent to the Spam/ Junk folder


Email



Unsubscribe