Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter:

S. 14A, Rule 8D & Daga Capital: Bombay High Court to hear arguments

Writ Petition bearing No. 50 of 2010 (Indian Exporters Grievances Forum & Other vs. CIT) challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 8D has been admitted on 12.1.2010 by Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon’ble Shri Justice J.P. Devadhar of the Bombay High Court.

Update: The final hearing of the said matter including appeals relating to section 14A have been adjourned to 15.2.2010, 23.3.2010, 12.4.2010, 22.06.2010, 13.7.2010.

All those having matters relating to interpretation of section 14A which are pending before the High Court are requested to give the Appeal Nos. to the Associate for grouping matters.


One comment on “S. 14A, Rule 8D & Daga Capital: Bombay High Court to hear arguments
  1. Manish Pandit says:

    Can the AO invoke Rule 8D for a matter u/s 14A set aside by the CIT(A) and restored to the AO for AY 2004-05 for fresh consideration?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Top

If you are a tax professional, you must sign up for our free newsletter. Why? Because we keep you informed about the latest developments in the world of tax. We focus only on the most important must-read judgements & articles that will impact your day-to-day professional work. You can see a chronological listing of all our postings on twitter & facebook


IMPORTANT: After signing up & clicking on the confirmation mail, send a test/ blank mail to editor@itatonline.info. Why? Because it is the easiest way to add our email address to your address/ contacts book and ensure that our Newsletter does not get sent to the Spam/ Junk folder


Email



Unsubscribe