With regard to The Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, the CBDT had earlier Circular No. 17 of 2016 dated 20th May, 2016 in which it provided clarifications to 14 queries. The CBDT has now issued Circular No. 24 of 2016 dated 27th June 2016 in which it has clarified further queries received from the public about various provisions of the Scheme.
Circular No. 24 of 2016
F.No.142/8/2016-TPL
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(TPL Division)
***
Dated 27th of June, 2016Clarifications on the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016
The Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Scheme’) incorporated as Chapter IX of the Finance Act, 2016 provides an opportunity to persons who have not paid full taxes in the past to come forward and declare the undisclosed income and pay tax, surcharge and penalty totaling in all 45% of such undisclosed income declared. The Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’) have been notified. In this regard, Circular No. 17 of 2016 dated 20th May, 2016 issued by the Board provided clarifications to 14 queries. Subsequently, further queries have been received from the public about various provisions of the Scheme. The Board has considered the same and the following clarifications are issued.-
Question No.1: If only part payment of the tax, surcharge and penalty payable on undisclosed income declared under the Scheme is made before 30.11.2016, then whether the entire declaration fails as per section 187(3) of the Finance Act, 2016 or pro-rata declaration on which tax, surcharge and penalty has been paid remains valid?
Answer: In case of part payment, the entire declaration made under the Scheme shall be invalid. The declaration under the Scheme shall be valid only when the complete payment of tax, surcharge and penalty is made on or before 30.11.2016.
Question No.2: In case of amalgamation or in case of conversion of a company into LLP, if the amalgamated entity or LLP, as the case may be, wants to declare for the year prior to amalgamation/conversion, then whether a declaration is to be filed in the name of amalgamated entity/LLP or in the name of the amalgamating company or company existing prior to conversion into LLP?
Answer: Since the amalgamating company or the company prior to conversion into LLP is no more into existence and the assets/liabilities of such erstwhile entities have been taken over by the amalgamated company/LLP, the declaration is to be made in the name of the amalgamated company or the LLP, as the case may be, for the year in which the amalgamation/conversion takes place.
Question No.3: Whether the Scheme is open only to residents or to non-residents also?
Answer: The Scheme is available to every person, whether resident or nonresident.
Question No.4: If undisclosed income relating to an assessment year prior to A.Y. 2016-17, say A.Y. 2001-02 is detected after the closure of the Scheme, then what shall be the treatment of undisclosed income so detected?
Answer: As per the provisions of section 197(c) of the Finance Act, 2016, such income of A.Y. 2001-02 shall be assessed in the year in which the notice under section 148 or 153A or 153C, as the case may be, of the Income-tax Act is issued by the Assessing Officer. Further, if such undisclosed income is detected in the form of investment in any asset then value of such asset shall be as if the asset has been acquired or made in the year in which the notice under section 148/153A/153C is issued and the value shall be determined in accordance with rule 3 of the Rules.
Question No.5: Whether a person on whom a search has been conducted in April, 2016 but notice under section 153A is not served upto 31.05.2016, is eligible to declare undisclosed income under the Scheme?
Answer: No, in such a case time for issuance of notice under section 153A has not expired. Hence the person is not eligible to avail the Scheme in respect of assessment years for which notice under section 153A can be issued.
Question No.6: As per Circular No.17 of 2016, question No.14, it is not mandatory to attach the valuation report. But Form-1 states “attach valuation report”. How to interpret?
Answer: It is necessary for the declarant to obtain the valuation report but it is not mandatory for him to attach the same with the declaration made in Form-1. However, the jurisdictional Pr. Commissioner/ Commissioner in order to ascertain the correctness of the value of the asset quoted in Form-1 may require the declarant to file the valuation report before issuing the acknowledgment in Form-2. In such a circumstance, it will be necessary for the declarant to make the report available to the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner.
Question No.7: Is it mandatory to furnish PAN in the Form of declaration?
Answer: Yes, PAN is the unique identifier for all direct tax purposes. This is also necessary in order to claim the benefits and immunities available under the Scheme.
Question No.8: If any proceeding is pending before the Settlement Commission, can a person be considered eligible for the Scheme?
Answer: No, a person shall not be eligible for the Scheme in respect of assessment years for which proceeding is pending with Settlement Commission.
Question No.9: Land is acquired by the assessee in year 2001 from assessed income and is regularly disclosed in return of income. Subsequently in the year 2014, a building is constructed on the said land and the construction cost is not disclosed by the assessee. What shall be the fair market value of such building for the purposes of the Scheme?
Answer: Fair market value of land and building in such a case shall be computed in accordance with Rule 3(2) by allowing proportionate deduction in respect of asset acquired from assessed income.
Question No.10: Whether cases where summons under section 131(1A) have been issued by the Department or letter under the Non-filer Monitoring System (NMS) or under section 133(6) are issued are eligible for the Scheme?
Answer: Cases where summons under section 131(1A) have been issued by the department or letters for enquiry under NMS or under section 133(6) are issued but no notice under section 142 or 143(2) or 148 or 153A or 153C [as specified in section 196(e)] of the Finance Act, 2016 has been issued are eligible for the Scheme.
Question No.11: If notices under section 142, 143(2) or 148 have been issued after 31.05.2016 and assessee makes declaration under the Scheme then what shall be the fate of these notices?
Answer: As clarified vide Explanatory Circular No. 17 dated 20.5.2016, a person shall not be eligible for the Scheme in respect of the assessment year for which a notice under section 142, 143(2) or 148 has been received by him on or before 31.5.2016. In a case where notice has been received after the said date, the assessee shall be eligible to make a declaration under the Scheme for the said assessment year. Such declaration shall be valid if it has not been made by suppression of facts or misrepresentation and the amount payable under the Scheme has been duly paid within the specified time. On furnishing by the declarant the certificate issued by the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner in Form-4 to the Assessing Officer, the proceedings initiated vide notice under section 142, 143(2) or 148 shall be deemed to have been closed.
Why the Govt is asking only for 45% tax for “VIKAS OF THE COUNTRY”. And what the Govt will do with this 45%?
More then Half of this will be spent on politician’s/Officer’s allowances and rest will only go for development purposes.
(1)Whereas Govt. Should allow everybody to bring back
their 100% money from foreign banks by 30.09.2016 for
Investment in specified Industries in specified areas
i.e under developed states.
It will give employment to people of that areas,&
revenue addition of that states & Central Govt. for
further development.
(2)For persons who has invested undisclosed money in
Immovable properties should be given a Loan equivalent
to 45% tax @ 15% Interest for 10-15 years, to deposit
the same as tax with the Govt.
(3)For persons(defaulter) who are having Liquid
cash/jewelry should be asked to purchase bonds; say
“BHARAT VIKAS BONDS” of 9 years. And no interest will
be paid to them for 9 years.After 9 years they can
en-cash their bonds.
GOVT TO PROVIDE LOAN AGAINST PROPERTY DECLARED OF 45%VALUE WITH 10%INT PERIOD 10/15 YRS-AS NO LIQUIDITY TO PAY TAX
BLACK MONEY IS MAINLY IN PROPERTIES BUT SURPRISINGLY
WEALTH TAX ABOLISHED PL PL BRING BACK THIS GOOD LAW–FILING W TAX RETURN/W TAX LAW PUT SERIOUS OBLIGATION TAX-PENALTY-PROSECUTION-FOR NOT FILING W TAXRET/TAX
Comment and query in respect of response to Q. 10:
when non-filer is entitled to any refund for a year in which Return was filed, will he be entitled to refund while filing the un-filed return under the scheme?
Question No.4: If undisclosed income relating to an assessment year prior to A.Y. 2016-17, say A.Y. 2001-02 is detected after the closure of the Scheme, then what shall be the treatment of undisclosed income so detected?
Answer: As per the provisions of section 197(c) of the Finance Act, 2016, such income of A.Y. 2001-02 shall be assessed in the year in which the notice under section 148 or 153A or 153C, as the case may be, of the Income-tax Act is issued by the Assessing Officer. Further, if such undisclosed income is detected in the form of investment in any asset then value of such asset shall be as if the asset has been acquired or made in the year in which the notice under section 148/153A/153C is issued and the value shall be determined in accordance with rule 3 of the Rules.
Not able to understand as to how a Central Board administring law on Direct taxes can provide such a stupid answer. None can assess the income of A.Y.2001-02 after 31/01/2008, let alone 2016-17.
You are right jagadish no income can be reassessed u/s 148 after 6 years from the year in which is earned. I think the cbdt in order to promote this ridiculous scheme has forgotten its own law but on the contrary expects the assessee to remember all the provisions of the act.I would like to point out 2 major defects of this scheme which will be a huge deterrent in the success of the scheme
1. The heavy rate of tax @ 45%
2. Taking the market value of assets as on date of declaration and not taking the actual cost to purchase such assets which actually was the undisclosed income.