The CBDT has issued a directive dated 17th May 2016 in which it is noted that in certain cases orders passed by the CIC are not being complied with by the Income Tax Department. The CBDT has stated that in view of the fact that the orders of CIC are binding under the RTI Act, 2005 unless stayed or reversed by higher courts, all the concerned authorities / officers/ CPIOs should ensure that the orders passed by CIC in appeals and complaints under the RTI Act, 2005 are invariably complied with within the time fixed by the Commission, unless they are stayed or reversed by higher courts. It is warned that any deviation will be viewed adversely

The CBDT has issued the following orders of transfers and postings: (i) Order No. 90 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Additional and Joint Commissioners of Income-tax; (ii) Order No. 91 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Additional and Joint Commissioners of Income-tax; (iii) Order No. 92 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Additional and Joint Commissioners of Income-tax; (iv) Order No. 93 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Joint Commissioners of Income-tax (on promotion); (v) Order No. 94 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Assistant Commissioners of Income-tax; (vi) Order No. 95 of 2016 dated 16.05.2016 for postings and transfers of officers in the grade of Assistant Commissioners of Income-tax;

The Narendra Modi Government has sent a bone-chilling warning to all income-tax officers that they will have to pay a steep price if they continue with their nefarious activities of harassing taxpayers with the illicit objective of extorting money from them

Taxmann has systematically analyzed the several amendments made to the Finance Bill 2016 at the stage of its being passed by the Lok Sabha. Several of the changes are of critical importance to taxpayers

The CBDT has issued a directive dated 2nd May 2016 in which it has been directed that the income arising from transfer of unlisted shares would be considered under the head ‘Capital Gain’, irrespective of period of holding, with a view to avoid disputes/litigation and to maintain uniform approach

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) vide order dated 8th June 2015 constituted a Committee to inter alia suggest the framework for computation of book profit for the purposes of levy of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘ the Act’) for Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) compliant companies in the year of adoption and thereafter. After a detailed discussion of the provisions of section 115JB of the Act, Ind AS and relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013, the Committee has suggested a framework for computation of books profit of Ind AS compliant companies

The CBDT has issued Circular No. 11/2016 dated 26.04.2016 stating that in accordance with the judgement of the Supreme Court in UOI vs. Tata Chemical Limited 363 ITR 658 it is settled that if resident deductor is entitled for the refund of tax deposited under Section 195 of the Act, then it has to be refunded with interest under section 244A of the Act, from the date of payment of such tax. The CBDT has directed that no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground by the officers of the department and appeals already filed on this issue may not be pressed

The CBDT has issued Circular No. 09/DV/2016 dated 26th April 2016 in which it has expressed the view, by relying on the judgement dated dated 8.7.15 of the Kerala High Court in Grihalaxmi Vision vs. ACIT that the limitation for imposition of penalty under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961 does not commence at the level of the Assessing Officer (below the rank of Joint Commissioner of lncome Tax) but commences at the level of the Range authority i.e. the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax./Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax. The CBDT has advised Assessing Officers (below the rank of Joint Commissioner of Income) to make a reference to the Range Head regarding any violation of the provisions of section 269SS and section 269T of the Act, as the case may be, in the course of the assessment proceedings (or any other proceedings under the Act). It has directed that the Assessing Officer, (below the rank of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax) shall not issue the notice in this regard. The Range Head will issue the penalty notice and shall dispose/ complete the proceedings within the limitation prescribed u/s 275(1)(c) of the Act