CBDT Guidelines For Selection Of Cases For Scrutiny During FY 2017-18

The CBDT has issued Instruction No. 5/2017 dated 7th July 2017 by which it has laid down the procedure and criteria for compulsory manual selection of returns/cases requiring scrutiny during the financial-year 2017-2018. It is also stated that cases are also being selected under CASS-2017 (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection) on the basis of broad based selection filters and in a non-discretionary manner in two categories of Limited Scrutiny & Complete Scrutiny.




Instruction No. 5/2017
Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue (CBDT)

North-Block, New Delhi the 7th of July, 2017

To

All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax

All Pr. Directors-General of Income-tax/ Directors-General of Income-tax

Sir/Madam

Subject: Guidelines for selection of cases for scrutiny during the financial-year 2017-2018-regd.-

1. In supersession of earlier Instructions on the above subject, the Board hereby lays down the following procedure and criteria for compulsory manual selection of returns/cases requiring scrutiny during the financial-year 2017-2018:-

(i) Cases involving addition in an earlier assessment year(s) on a recurring issue of law or fact of following amounts:

– in excess of Rs 25 lakhs in eight metro charges at Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata , Mumbai and Pune, while at other charges, quantum of such addition should exceed Rs. 10 lakhs;

– for transfer pricing cases, quantum of such addition should exceed 10 crore and where:

(a) such an addition in assessment has become final as no further appeal was/has been filed; or

(b) such an addition has been confirmed at any stage of appellate process in favour of revenue and assessee has not filed furth er appeal ; or

(c) such an addition has been confirmed at 1st appeal stage in favour of revenue or subsequently and further appeal of assessee is pending.

(ii) All assessments pertaining to Survey under section 133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) excluding those cases where books of accounts, documents were not impounded and returned income (excluding any disclosure made during the Survey) is not less than returned in come of preceding assessment year. However, where the assessee retracts from disclosure made during the Survey, such cases will not be covered by this exclusion.

(iii) Assessments in search and seizure cases to be made under section(s) 158B, 158BC, 158BD, 153A & 153C read with section 143(3) of the Act and also for the returns filed for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which authorization for search and seizure was executed u/s 132 or 132A of the Act.

(iv) Return filed in response to notice u /s 148 of the Act.

(v) Cases where registration/approval under various sections of the Act such as 12A, 35(1) (ii)/(iii), 10(23C) of the Act have not been granted or have been cancelled/withdrawn by the competent authority, yet the assessee has been claiming tax-exemption/deduction in the return . However, where such order of withdrawal of registration/approval has been reversed/set-aside in appellate proceedings, those cases will not be selected under this clause.

(vi) Cases in respect of which specific and verifiable information pointing out tax-evasion is given by any Government Department/ Authority. However, before selecting a case for scrutiny under this criterion, Assessing Officer shall take prior administrative approval from the concerned jurisdictional Pr. CIT/ Pr.DIT/C IT/DIT.

2. Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS):

Cases are also being selected under CASS-2017 on the basis of broad based selection filters and in a non-discretionary manner in two categories Limited Scrutiny & Complete Scrutiny. List of such cases is being separately intimated by Pr.DGJT(Systems) to the concerned jurisdictional authorities for further action in these cases.

3. These instructions may be brought to the notice of all concerned for necessary compliance.

4. Hindi version to follow.

(Rohit Garg)

Director–ITA.ll, CBDT
F.No. 225/180/2017 /ITA.ll


2 comments on “CBDT Guidelines For Selection Of Cases For Scrutiny During FY 2017-18
  1. K.P. GARG says:

    Please give details of wrong selection of case in manual scrutiny and assessment set aside by ITAT

  2. CA JP AGARWAL says:

    So called voluntary (Almostvalways under pressure) Disclosures of income in survey / searches in Incometax have become part of life despite CBDT saying no to it, as it does not have any legal approval, but on contrary CBDT in its scrutiny norms recognises them.

    In the process of disclosures of income, wherein the assessee as well the department has to compromise leaving various adverse evidences found and in my opinion the very purpose of such action is defeated. Such actions become source of revenue collection rather than deterrent to tax evasions.

    If the department wants to encourage disclosures than it should be given legal recognisance or should be specifically made illegal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*