COURT: | Supreme Court |
CORAM: | Prafulla C. Pant J, Ranjan Gogoi J |
SECTION(S): | 263 |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | Revision |
COUNSEL: | Shyam Diwan |
DATE: | May 11, 2016 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | May 16, 2016 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2001-02 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 263: Even if AO applies mind and decides not to assess expenditure as unexplained u/s 69C because the assessee withdrew the claim for deduction, the CIT is entitled to revise the assessment on the ground that the matter needed further investigation |
There can be no doubt that so long as the view taken by the Assessing Officer is a possible view the same ought not to be interfered with by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act merely on the ground that there is another possible view of the matter. Permitting exercise of revisional power in a situation where two views are possible would really amount to conferring some kind of an appellate power in the revisional authority. This is a course of action that must be desisted from. However, the above is not the situation in the present case in view of the reasons stated by the learned C.I.T. on the basis of which the said authority felt that the matter needed further investigation, a view with which we wholly agree. Making a claim which would prima facie disclose that the expenses in respect of which deduction has been claimed has been incurred and thereafter abandoning/withdrawing the same gives rise to the necessity of further enquiry in the interest of the Revenue
Recent Comments