COURT: | ITAT Delhi |
CORAM: | C. M. Garg (JM), Pramod Kumar (AM) |
SECTION(S): | 40(a)(i), 40(a)(ia), 92CA(3) |
GENRE: | International Tax, Transfer Pricing |
CATCH WORDS: | Berry Ratio, sogo shosha, Transfer Pricing |
COUNSEL: | M S Syali |
DATE: | October 21, 2014 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | October 22, 2014 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2007-08 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
In a case of "sogo shosha" business model (high volume, low risk, trading of goods), the "berry ratio" (benchmarking gross profit and/ or net revenues (after subtraction of cost of sales) against operating expenses is an appropriate PLI. To avoid discrimination under Article 24(3) of the India-Japan DTAA, the benefit of no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) (in the cast of residents) for want of TDS if the recipient has paid the tax has to be extended to non-residents u/s 40(a)(i) |
As regards the transfer pricing adjustment: (i) Even the TPO does not dispute that (a) MCI is a low risk activity in the field of trading, (b) MCJ group is primarily involved in high volume sales, or ‘colossal sales’ of …
Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Read More »
Recent Comments